Final comments: How has the genetic code become „from the beginning“ that what it was: why with those bases and that exact number of bases; why with those amino acids and why with that exact number of amino acids; with exactly 3 „stop“ codons in the alphabet which functions on the level of words, with exactly one termination situation in the alphabet which functions on the level of letters (as showed graphically in Figure 1 in Shcherbak, 1994, p 475)? All this follows from a strict determination by nucleon number presented in chapter 4 and a strict determination based on physical and chemical parameters presented in chapter 6. The genetic code, therefore, must be universal for life which could exist anywhere in the universe (with this the answer to question 1 from the Introduction has been given). But it is not universal in the sense that there is one-meaning correspondence between the words of one alphabet and the letters of the other alphabet in all cases. …
An excerpt from a lecture at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (Belgrade, October 31, 2007)
This synopsis announces a regular paper on the same topic it provides evidence for three hypotheses: The unity of chemism and semiosis within genetic code; Boolean spaces are key determinants of the genetic code, and third: perfect and friendly numbers (as quantities within Boolean spaces) are key determinants of the Genetic code. DOI 10.31219/osf.io/me8sj
In several previous works, I presented the mirror symmetry in the set of protein amino acids, expressed through the number of atoms. Here, however, the same thing is shown but over the number of nucleons and molecules mass. Compared to the previous version of the paper, minimal changes have been made, and Display 2 as well as Figures 3 and 4 have been added.(arXiv:2108.01563v4 [q-bio.BM])
In this second part of the paper, the pairs of protein amino acids (AAs), canonical in the genetic code (GC) in the three system-arrangements (OS, DS and AS), presented in the first part, are compared with the Table of chemical similarity of AAs.
In this second part of the short communication (Ref. 2), we give an argument more in favor of the validity of the precognition status of the final result of my 40 years of genetic code researches. …
U ovom drugom delu kratkog saopštenja (Ref. 2) dajemo argument više u prilog validnosti statusa prekognicije finalnog rezultata mojih 40-godišnjih istraživanja genetskog koda.
This short communication reveals final result of my 40 years of research into the genetic code with the status of a precognition in the sense that it was seen in one of my dreams 75 years ago.
U ovom kratkom saopštenju obelodanjuje se finalni rezultat mojih 40-godišnjih istraživanja genetskog koda sa statusom prekognicije u smislu što je viđen u snu pre 75 godina.